THE READYBYREP PRODUCT TOUR
One athlete.
A clear next step.
Follow Jordan’s feedback through development, practice, and the next game. Switch perspectives at any step.
Explore without signing in.
Fictional athletes and games throughout. This tour does not access or change team records.
STEP 6 OF 6 · COACH VIEW
Check progress
Reassess the skill and compare performance with context.
Review the next evidence
Sample game history · Jordan Lee and the offense
Against Summit, the stopped-feet tag appears on 2 of 20 graded run-blocking reps, compared with 5 of 20 against Valley. Coach checks practice execution alongside the game history.
Sep 17, 2026 · 20 graded / 20 played
Sep 10, 2026 · 20 graded / 20 played
Performance summary
Points per graded snap improved by 0.25 points per snap (-0.10 → +0.15). The offense unit changed by +0.25 points per snap (-0.10 → +0.15). This athlete’s change matched the unit’s.
| Metric | Summit | Valley | DifferenceSelected − comparison | Insights |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points per graded snapTotal points ÷ graded played snaps | +0.15 | -0.10 | +0.25Higher | Points per graded snap improved by 0.25 points per snap (-0.10 → +0.15). The offense unit changed by +0.25 points per snap (-0.10 → +0.15). This athlete’s change matched the unit’s. |
| Successful repsJob Done (0), Win (+1), or Impact (+2) ÷ graded played snaps | 90.0% | 75.0% | +15.0 ppHigher | Successful reps improved by 15.0 percentage points (18/20 now; 15/20 before). The offense unit changed by +15.0 pp (76.7% → 91.7%). This athlete’s change matched the unit’s. |
| Negative repsLoss (−1) or Bust (−2) ÷ graded played snaps | 10.0% | 25.0% | -15.0 ppLower | Negative reps improved by 15.0 percentage points (2/20 now; 5/20 before). The offense unit changed by -15.0 pp (23.3% → 8.3%). This athlete’s change matched the unit’s. |
| Assignment accuracyCorrect assignments ÷ assignment-assessed played snaps | 100.0% | 95.0% | +5.0 ppHigher | Assignment accuracy improved by 5.0 percentage points (20/20 now; 19/20 before). The offense unit changed by +5.0 pp (95.0% → 100.0%). This athlete’s change matched the unit’s. |
Differences use the underlying rates before rounding. “pp” means percentage points. Higher points, success and assignment accuracy are favorable; fewer negative reps are favorable.
Unit context includes this athlete and pools all entered offense assessments: 60/60 graded/played athlete-snaps now (3 athletes), versus 60/60 before (3 athletes). Assignment checks: 60 now, 60 before.
Counts reflect saved entries, not a complete participation record. Position, responsibility and opponent changes can also affect results; these notes describe the scores, not the cause of a change.
Loading performance chart…
Below is the unit board as Jordan sees it after coach sharing.
Offense · 2026 · Summit · Sep 17, 2026
Growing as a unit
3 published athlete reports · Rates pool graded athlete-snaps, so a player with more assessed reps contributes more to the unit average.
- Points / graded snap
- +0.15 +0.25 · Higher
- Successful reps
- 91.7% +15.0 pp · Higher
- Assignment accuracy
- 100.0% +5.0 pp · Higher
60 graded / 60 played · 60 assignments assessed
Comparison game: 60 graded / 60 played · 60 assignments assessed
Our unit focus: Maintain a balanced base and keep feet active through contact.
Changes vs. Valley · Sep 10, 2026. Changes compare the previous recorded game in this season and unit. Opponents and responsibilities may differ.
YOUR PROGRESS
Your next rep matters
20 graded / 20 played · 20 assignments assessed
Comparison game: 20 graded / 20 played · 20 assignments assessed
Similar recorded context. A unit average includes different positions and assignments; it is context, not a position-adjusted rating.
Your execution: 90.0% of graded reps were Job Done or better. 20 of 20 assessed assignments were correct.
Keep feet active through contact · Review Sep 17, 2026
Your growth alongside the unit
Points per graded snap · −2 to +2 · 0 = job done
● You · solid line ○ Unit · dashed line
Only your published game reports in this season and unit are shown. Unshared unit boards leave gaps; lines do not bridge a missing previous game. One point does not establish a trend.
Game data and grading coverage
| Game | You | Published unit | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canyon · Sep 3, 2026 | -0.30 | -0.30 | You: 20 / 20 graded. Unit: 60 / 60 athlete-snaps graded |
| Valley · Sep 10, 2026 | -0.10 | -0.10 | You: 20 / 20 graded. Unit: 60 / 60 athlete-snaps graded |
| Summit · Sep 17, 2026 | +0.15 | +0.15 | You: 20 / 20 graded. Unit: 60 / 60 athlete-snaps graded |
Everyone’s contribution
Alphabetical order. Every position contributes differently. Use the change and coaching context alongside the current score.
3 of 3 published reports shown. Filters do not change the unit average.
Alex Rivera
C
- Points / graded snap
- +0.20 +0.25 · Higher
- Successful reps
- 95.0% +15.0 pp · Higher
- Assignment accuracy
- 100.0% +5.0 pp · Higher
20 graded / 20 played · 20 assignments assessed
Comparison game: 20 graded / 20 played · 20 assignments assessed
Similar recorded context
Jordan LeeYou
LG
- Points / graded snap
- +0.15 +0.25 · Higher
- Successful reps
- 90.0% +15.0 pp · Higher
- Assignment accuracy
- 100.0% +5.0 pp · Higher
20 graded / 20 played · 20 assignments assessed
Comparison game: 20 graded / 20 played · 20 assignments assessed
Similar recorded context
Sam Taylor
RT
- Points / graded snap
- +0.10 +0.25 · Higher
- Successful reps
- 90.0% +15.0 pp · Higher
- Assignment accuracy
- 100.0% +5.0 pp · Higher
20 graded / 20 played · 20 assignments assessed
Comparison game: 20 graded / 20 played · 20 assignments assessed
Similar recorded context
0 = job done. Successful reps = grades 0, +1, or +2 divided by graded snaps. Assignment accuracy uses separately assessed assignments. Changes in percentages are percentage points (pp). No-snap events, unknown participation, and did-not-play entries do not enter performance rates. Missing grades stay blank.
Only coach-shared unit boards and published athlete summaries appear here. Teammates’ individual messages, play details, goals, and private notes are not included. Scores are descriptive; changed roles, incomplete grading, and small samples can affect comparisons.
Who would you like to support?
One athlete, your family, a school team, a private coaching practice, or another program. Tell us about the development work you want to do.